Because it is considered to intimidate a number of witnesses so that they can be questioned.

Jakarta, posinternasional.com

Lawyer OC Kaligis reported Ondo prosecutor Mulatua Pandapotan to the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) officials.

Because it is considered to intimidate a number of witnesses so that they can be questioned because it is considered to violate legal regulations, Tuesday (30/01).

“Based on article 108 of the Criminal Procedure Code, everyone is obliged to report if they know of a crime to the authorities.

“If an official violates the procedural law, he can be subject to article 421 of the Criminal Code,” said Kaligis in Jakarta, Tuesday (30/1/2024).

Kaligis said that the Ondo Prosecutor acted arbitrarily in intimidating the Heddy Kandou case because he did not name Padmasari Metta as a suspect.

According to him, it is suspected that Padmasari should have been the main perpetrator based on the testimony of five witnesses in the case.

According to him, as support for the report is the statement at the trial which was opened to the public in case No.85/PID.SUS-TPK/2023/PN. JKT. Pst That witness Moch. Rizal Otoluwa (Director of PT Quartee Technologies) and witness Rinaldo (Director of PT Interdata Technologies Sukses) during the prosecutor’s examination were intimidated into taking sides.

If not subject to high threat.

“It turns out that it is true that Rizal was sentenced to 10 years in prison and Rinaldo to 12 years in prison and PT Telkom was sentenced to a maximum of only 5 years,” said the Professor at the Faculty of Law, Manado State University.

During the trial, Heddy Kandou told the judge that he had obtained information In the form of public reports, there are allegations that Rp. 8 billion in money flowed to prosecutors, allegedly from Legal Telkom, during the investigation.

Through the testimony of the five people, it was proven that Padmasari should have been a suspect because he was proven to have actively contacted PT Telkom and created and provided various documents but instead was only a witness.

Kaligis said that his client Heddy Kandou was made a suspect even though he was not involved in the PT Telkom project, and there was no agreement document signed by Heddy.

In fact, a number of witnesses such as Rizal Otoluwa, Stefanus Suwito Gozali, Syehlina Yahya, Rinaldo and Sosro H. Karsosoemo explained that Padmasari Metta, who was active in the a quo case, was not a suspect because he was protected by the prosecutor.

This is because Heddy Kandou (Director of PT Haka Luxury) was named a suspect in the criminal act of corruption in the procurement of goods and services from PT Interdata Teknologi Sukses with PT PINS Indonesia.

PT Telkom Telstra and PT Infomedia Nusantara in 2017-2018 valued at IDR 232 billion, and this case is ongoing at the Jakarta Corruption Court, currently hearing witness statements.

** (namraw aytida)

Related Posts