The 2024 presidential election is being participated by three pairs of candidates, namely serial number 01 Anies Rasyid Baswedan.

Jakarta, posinternasional.com

Academician at Manado State University (UNM), North Sulawesi, Prof. Dr. Otto Cornelis (OC) Kaligis SH MH, stated that currently hate speech is circulating after the February 14 voting in the 2024 presidential election. OC Kaligis in Jakarta, Sunday (3/3/2024)

Said that around 200 million people who took part in the 02 presidential election came out as winners, more than 58 percent of them were chosen, so hate speech emerged.

“If the results of the presidential election are won by another party, not pair 02, then the results of the quick count are not criticized at all, they are even justified,” he said.

The 2024 presidential election is being participated by three pairs of candidates, namely serial number 01 Anies Rasyid Baswedan paired with Muhaimin Iskandar, 02 Prabowo Subianto – Gibran Rakabuming Raka and 03 Ganjar Pranowo paired with Mahfud MD.

He questioned the allegations of a handful of people, perhaps only 100 people compared to the 110 million Prabowo – Gibran voters, whether it made sense for the 110 million to be classified as fraudulent voters.

According to him, the target of the shooting was President Joko Widodo (Jokowi), even though it could be the one who makes slander every day passing the toll road, his family in the village enjoys the dam that Jokowi built.

The people of the outer islands enjoy sea and air transportation and connecting bridges.

“Basically, they are deliberately blind to the development results that Jokowi has made for the benefit of the people,” he said.

Not only are they inciting and slandering, including Jokowi’s move to bestow the rank of General on Prabowo, this action is material for incitement, including social assistance for small people who have difficulty with rice.

Likewise, the documentary film Dirty Vote was declared a historical film about the most fraudulent presidential election in recent history in Indonesia.

He added that Prof. Mahfud MD’s statement was true that in the presidential election process, the losing pair would definitely think that the winning pair had committed fraud.

Kaligis said he witnessed the process at the 2019 Constitutional Court (MK) presidential election when Prabowo lost against Jokowi, that Prabowo’s lawyer, Bambang Widjojanto, at that time brought seven containers of evidence.

But what happened, said Kaligis, was that not a single container could prove that the presidential election was fraudulent, so lawyer Bambang Widjojanto represented Prabowo, who was paired with Sandiaga Uno at that time, and lost.

Even though they know that they can only annul the decision of the General Election Commission (KPU) through the Constitutional Court, they still maneuver through the right of inquiry in the DPR.

All means were used, including black campaigns, mobilizing a group of NGOs to carry out street justice, demonstrations in front of the palace to thwart the victory of pair 02.

In fact, as adherents of democracy, high-ranking officials realize that losing and winning in the presidential election is proof of the existence of democracy in Indonesia.

** (namraw aytida)

Related Posts