When did the chaos start to occur, during the registration of candidates and the debate, each candidate had not put up resistance.

Jakarta, posinternasional.com

Manado State University (UNM) academic Prof OC Kaligis SH MH stated that the evidence submitted in the form of “omon-omon” (talk-talk) in the 2024 Presidential Candidate petition numbers 01 and 03 at.

The Constitutional Court (MK) is not evidence that is not recognized in procedural law . Prof. Kaligis in Jakarta, Friday (3/5/2024)

Said that his party noted that so far there have only been approximately four court decisions regarding election fraud.

“When did the chaos start to occur, during the registration of candidates and the debate, each candidate had not put up resistance against the Prabowo-Gibran pair,” he said.

In the 2024 presidential election there are three pairs of presidential candidates, namely serial number 01 Anies Rasyid Baswedan – Muhaimin Iskandar.

Serial number 02 Prabowo Subianto – Gibran Rakabuming Raka and serial number 01 Ganjar Pranowo – Mahfud MD.

Kaligis said that while the pair Anies and Ganjar were still confident that they would come out as winners, they were still calm.

But when the results of 11 survey institutions produced an average of more than 55 percent for Prabowo – Gibran.

Then at that time there began to be signs of unrest. He added that starting from the ranks of Rafly Harun, Denny Indrayana and Abraham Samad, they launched character assassination attacks against the 02 presidential candidate pair.

“Especially for Gibran and President Jokowi who are cawe-cawe (interfering) to win the Prabowo – Gibran pair,” Kaligis stressed.

According to him, for practitioners who are involved in court, if they follow procedural law, there are limits to the arguments that must be developed between the plaintiff and the defendant or the applicant and the respondent.

However, if the applicant’s petition is addressed to the General Election Commission (KPU), then the limits of the parties’ arguments are the KPU laws and regulations.

Even in the case of petitions 01 and 03 against the KPU which were discussed in the posita.

They were not limited to inflating votes but strayed far into a request that President Jokowi be impeached for committing an unconstitutional act of committing an act against the social assistance law.

He said that in essence all the accusations had nothing to do with the petitum of vote inflating, even though all the accusations were not proven according to the Constitutional Court judges in their decision.

Kaligis said the basis of the argument was KPU Regulation No. 2 of 2024 concerning the stages and schedule for the election of Governor and Deputy Governor, Regent and Deputy Regent and Mayor and Deputy Mayor.

So this also applies to the election of the President and Vice President.

He was surprised that since the voting at the TPS was witnessed by representatives of each pair of serial numbers 01, 02 and 03.

As well as the supporting political party but it was later declared fraudulent even though it was not proven at the Constitutional Court.

** (namraw aytida)

Related Posts